Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,063

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $52,883,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
41Richard J LarsenRexburg, ID 83440$196,558
42K-k EnterprisesAmerican Falls, ID 83211$192,336
43Circle C RanchHamer, ID 83425$192,000
44Hansen Farms Joint VentureRupert, ID 83350$190,463
45Tyson FunkAmerican Falls, ID 83211$189,198
46Legacy Agro Business Dba Legacy FAmerican Falls, ID 83211$187,280
474 W FarmsBlackfoot, ID 83221$184,524
48Pancheri IncHowe, ID 83244$183,785
49T & S FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$180,992
50George And Renee PerschonBlackfoot, ID 83221$180,008
51Gary SkidmoreTerreton, ID 83450$174,820
52Grant Neibaur & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$174,712
53Tina ClingerAmerican Falls, ID 83211$174,150
54Mickelsen FarmsRigby, ID 83442$173,761
55Picabo Livestock CoPicabo, ID 83348$172,390
56H J Farms IncIdaho Falls, ID 83404$170,767
57Michelle LottIdaho Falls, ID 83401$169,552
58Kip O MartindaleAshton, ID 83420$169,508
59Keith Wilcox & Sons, IncRexburg, ID 83440$169,205
60David & Doug Neibaur FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$168,908

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag