Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,537

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $780,758,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41Chesterfield Land & Livestock AssociationGrace, ID 83241$1,263,559
42Merritt D Neibaur & Sons IncNewdale, ID 83436$1,249,104
43Minidoka LumberPaul, ID 83347$1,235,175
44Zollinger Cattle CoMalta, ID 83342$1,225,407
45Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen PtrRirie, ID 83443$1,190,444
46Craig JensenIdaho Falls, ID 83404$1,168,575
47David L WhitneyCaldwell, ID 83605$1,163,854
48Koester Farms IncLava Hot Springs, ID 83246$1,152,739
49Jones & WiderbergWest Jordan, UT 84088$1,131,822
50E Mark WellsBlackfoot, ID 83221$1,127,412
51Judys Ida Mon RanchIdaho Falls, ID 83406$1,120,282
52Harry & Diane Rinker Revocable TrNewport Beach, CA 92658$1,117,730
53Buehlers IncMalad City, ID 83252$1,114,942
54Blair FisherRexburg, ID 83440$1,110,415
55James RobinsonRockland, ID 83271$1,108,048
56Rodney Lynn RalphsRockland, ID 83271$1,098,508
57Spraker Land And Livestock LLCArco, ID 83213$1,084,110
58Warm Creek Ranch IncPocatello, ID 83201$1,081,930
59Thompson LivestockShelley, ID 83274$1,072,934
60Karen L GroverIdaho Falls, ID 83404$1,066,163

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag