Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 7,442
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $15,785,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Faulkner Land & Livestock Co Inc | Gooding, ID 83330 | $24,267 |
82 | Crapo Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $24,197 |
83 | Elmer Johnson Jr | Wendell, ID 83355 | $23,921 |
84 | Michelle Lott | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $23,785 |
85 | Brent Lott | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $23,784 |
86 | Grant 4-d Farms LLC | Rupert, ID 83350 | $23,673 |
87 | Kunau Farms | Burley, ID 83318 | $23,672 |
88 | Fiala Farms Inc | Jerome, ID 83338 | $23,560 |
89 | Keith Wilcox & Sons, Inc | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $23,155 |
90 | Gulley Walking G Ranch | Jerome, ID 83338 | $23,135 |
91 | D A Holderman LLC | Buhl, ID 83316 | $22,711 |
92 | K & W Dairy | Jerome, ID 83338 | $22,573 |
93 | Call Farms Jt Vent | Rigby, ID 83442 | $22,196 |
94 | Ronnie D Smith | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $22,192 |
95 | Torgesen Ranches Inc | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $22,160 |
96 | Wayne Fattig | Wendell, ID 83355 | $21,954 |
97 | Marsden Farms Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $21,943 |
98 | Pickett Ranch & Sheep Co | Oakley, ID 83346 | $21,911 |
99 | P&l Farms | Grace, ID 83241 | $21,904 |
100 | John Beukers | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $21,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”