Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 947
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $15,688,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Bull | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $39,412 |
82 | Glenn Blatter Farms Ptr | Ammon, ID 83406 | $38,895 |
83 | Neibaur Bros | Newdale, ID 83436 | $38,752 |
84 | Ball Trading Inc | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $38,244 |
85 | Schorzman Ranch Inc | Malta, ID 83342 | $37,776 |
86 | Ann M Scott Family Limited Partnership | Boise, ID 83704 | $37,596 |
87 | Pamara Brems | Phoenix, AZ 85023 | $37,553 |
88 | Roger F Rosdahl | Caldwell, ID 83605 | $37,328 |
89 | Ronald Jones | Rupert, ID 83350 | $37,318 |
90 | , | $37,318 | |
91 | Benson Ranch At Roy, LLC | American Falls, ID 83211 | $37,072 |
92 | M Bruce Fonnesbeck | Farmington, UT 84025 | $36,974 |
93 | Robert E Smith | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $36,826 |
94 | Deloy Ward | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $36,731 |
95 | David & Melanie Schwendiman Jv | Newdale, ID 83436 | $36,248 |
96 | Sherry Anderson | Paul, ID 83347 | $36,057 |
97 | Landon Anderson | Paul, ID 83347 | $36,057 |
98 | Shauna R Wright | Malad City, ID 83252 | $35,435 |
99 | Koompin Ag LLC | American Falls, ID 83211 | $35,400 |
100 | Pat Woodworth | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $35,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”