Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 940
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $3,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Thomas P Chadwick | Preston, ID 83263 | $7,171 |
102 | Larue Phillips | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $7,000 |
103 | Fred S Burmester | Downey, ID 83234 | $7,000 |
104 | Ruth Chugg | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,000 |
105 | Jeff Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,000 |
106 | Galen Williams | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $7,000 |
107 | Peggy Stolworthy | Firth, ID 83236 | $7,000 |
108 | Parkinson Farms Inc | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $7,000 |
109 | Wada Farms Inc | Pingree, ID 83262 | $7,000 |
110 | Desert Rose Ranch Inc | Gooding, ID 83330 | $7,000 |
111 | Tlr Incorporated | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $7,000 |
112 | Foster Company Ptr | Ririe, ID 83443 | $7,000 |
113 | John Fredrickson Company | Evergreen, CO 80439 | $7,000 |
114 | Nielsen Livestock Co | Paul, ID 83347 | $7,000 |
115 | Last Chance Farms | Boise, ID 83709 | $7,000 |
116 | Jones Farms Inc. | Ashton, ID 83420 | $6,966 |
117 | Don & Paul Clark | Georgetown, ID 83239 | $6,906 |
118 | Christian Family Trust | Riverside, CA 92504 | $6,901 |
119 | Bronson Sheep & Cattle Co | Burley, ID 83318 | $6,850 |
120 | Ruth Hackman Mauth | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 | $6,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”