Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 6,215
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $747,340,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rebecca Robinson | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $901,877 |
102 | U.l. Grover & Sons, Inc. | Dubois, ID 83423 | $900,015 |
103 | Pickett Ranch & Sheep Co | Oakley, ID 83346 | $898,680 |
104 | Ralph Wheatley | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $898,142 |
105 | Diane Schwendiman | Newdale, ID 83436 | $896,576 |
106 | Charles Woodworth | American Falls, ID 83211 | $896,489 |
107 | Ward & Sons Co Inc | Arbon, ID 83212 | $895,413 |
108 | D & K Judy Farms Inc | Idaho Falls, ID 83406 | $889,905 |
109 | Elmer H Stanger | Inkom, ID 83245 | $888,506 |
110 | Ricky Robinson | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $888,459 |
111 | Roy E Hincks | Aberdeen, ID 83210 | $888,376 |
112 | 2p Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $886,389 |
113 | Sherry Anderson | Paul, ID 83347 | $885,792 |
114 | Sarah Kate Schorzman | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $881,930 |
115 | Raymond Havlicak | Mccall, ID 83638 | $879,338 |
116 | Dan E Ralphs | Rockland, ID 83271 | $878,997 |
117 | Hanging L Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $869,665 |
118 | Violet Isaak | American Falls, ID 83211 | $867,062 |
119 | Dennis Rogers | Ashton, ID 83420 | $863,668 |
120 | Martin Munk | Rockland, ID 83271 | $861,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”