Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 6,215

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $747,340,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121W Dale RockwoodIdaho Falls, ID 83401$858,479
122Kent RogersAshton, ID 83420$856,426
123Arlo GroverRirie, ID 83443$854,329
124Francine RudeenAmerican Falls, ID 83211$854,191
125Neil Brown Family PtrRirie, ID 83443$848,877
126John Larry BasterrecheaRupert, ID 83350$844,481
127Agricol West IncRockland, ID 83271$842,536
128K C HenryLaurel, MT 59044$842,086
129Brad WoolstenhulmeMontpelier, ID 83254$839,909
130Blaine GroverDubois, ID 83423$835,371
131Brian P ReedRirie, ID 83443$831,246
132Dale F TubbsMalad City, ID 83252$819,827
133O G Myler & Sons IncPocatello, ID 83204$818,623
134Daralis RobinsonRockland, ID 83271$817,719
135Kyle MatthewsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$817,593
136Eliason & Sons IncBancroft, ID 83217$813,914
137J R Ream Ranch IncDingle, ID 83233$803,623
138David ModersitzkiBancroft, ID 83217$803,619
139V Darlene InskeepAberdeen, ID 83210$800,411
140Cleve G And Karol D Smith PartnershipMalta, ID 83342$798,896

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag