Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,210
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $19,280,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard M Wosnik | Hyde Park, UT 84318 | $37,212 |
122 | Christa Wosnik | Hyde Park, UT 84318 | $37,183 |
123 | J Henry Olsen III | Emmett, ID 83617 | $36,999 |
124 | John Larry Basterrechea | Rupert, ID 83350 | $36,957 |
125 | Delores A Martin | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $36,957 |
126 | Andersen Farm & Ranch LLC | Arbon, ID 83212 | $36,919 |
127 | Peggy Jarolimek | Burley, ID 83318 | $36,900 |
128 | Conrad J Isaak | American Falls, ID 83211 | $36,877 |
129 | Pamara Brems | Phoenix, AZ 85023 | $36,469 |
130 | J R Ream Ranch Inc | Dingle, ID 83233 | $36,399 |
131 | Pamella K. Miller | Rupert, ID 83350 | $36,250 |
132 | Thompson Farms Of Arbon Idaho | Providence, UT 84332 | $35,994 |
133 | Kyle Matthews | American Falls, ID 83211 | $35,680 |
134 | Shelly Matthews | American Falls, ID 83211 | $35,672 |
135 | Matthew R Critchfield | Orem, UT 84058 | $35,513 |
136 | David & Melanie Schwendiman Jv | Newdale, ID 83436 | $35,496 |
137 | Martin Munk | Rockland, ID 83271 | $35,484 |
138 | Susan Munk | Rockland, ID 83271 | $35,484 |
139 | Koompin Ag LLC | American Falls, ID 83211 | $35,400 |
140 | Ronald Jones | Rupert, ID 83350 | $35,215 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”