Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 947
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $15,688,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | , | $32,977 | |
122 | Carl Hofmeister | American Falls, ID 83211 | $32,892 |
123 | Koester Brothers Investment | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $32,262 |
124 | Campbell Land LLC | Malta, ID 83342 | $32,109 |
125 | Vicki Yost | Saint George, UT 84790 | $31,988 |
126 | , | $31,952 | |
127 | , | $31,952 | |
128 | Webster Land & Livestock LLC | Kaysville, UT 84037 | $31,693 |
129 | B & H Farming | Rupert, ID 83350 | $31,676 |
130 | Judy Dry Farm Trust | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $31,652 |
131 | Jenkins Farm LLC | Teton, ID 83451 | $31,520 |
132 | Mark Shawver | Pingree, ID 83262 | $31,428 |
133 | Edward Zackery Bartausky | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $31,428 |
134 | Bell Marsh Holdings, LLC | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $31,316 |
135 | Kathleen Barkdull | American Falls, ID 83211 | $31,115 |
136 | Ker Sisters LLC | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $31,104 |
137 | Kirk Polatis | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $30,929 |
138 | Delores A Martin | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $29,937 |
139 | Max Serr | Paul, ID 83347 | $29,766 |
140 | Karen Serr | Paul, ID 83347 | $29,766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”