Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Idaho
(Rep. Michael Simpson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,003
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $143,038,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Idaho Agcredit Pca ** | American Falls, ID 83211 | $1,476,418 |
| 2 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $1,356,762 |
| 3 | Riverside Farms Part | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $1,212,581 |
| 4 | Nor Vue Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $1,119,538 |
| 5 | Skyline Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $1,070,960 |
| 6 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $697,909 |
| 7 | Hansen Farms Of Idaho, LLC | Rupert, ID 83350 | $594,215 |
| 8 | Crapo Brothers | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $577,974 |
| 9 | Tlk Dairy Inc | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $557,983 |
| 10 | Hirai Farms LLC | Wendell, ID 83355 | $509,460 |
| 11 | Leavitt Farms General Partnership | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $492,167 |
| 12 | Driscoll Brothers | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $436,160 |
| 13 | Petterson Dairy LLC | Jerome, ID 83338 | $433,179 |
| 14 | Black Rock Ag Inc | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $400,362 |
| 15 | Searle Ag LLC | Shelley, ID 83274 | $390,572 |
| 16 | Golden Ridge Farms | Jackson, ID 83350 | $384,805 |
| 17 | Brent Lott Farms Partnership | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $372,812 |
| 18 | Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen Ptr | Ririe, ID 83443 | $369,353 |
| 19 | Clodhopper Farms | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $366,555 |
| 20 | Raft River Sod | Declo, ID 83323 | $347,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf