Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,063

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $52,883,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
21Ruff Times FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$329,633
22Diamond K FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$316,118
23Del Ray Holm & Sons Holm Del RayIdaho Falls, ID 83402$312,512
24R & R Farms PartnershipBlackfoot, ID 83221$298,884
25Wattenbarger FarmsShelley, ID 83274$280,196
26Skyline FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$272,235
27Idaho Grain ProducersNewdale, ID 83436$252,791
28Shackelford FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$250,582
29Schritter Farms IncAberdeen, ID 83210$230,248
30Reed FarmsPingree, ID 83262$228,626
31Foster Land & Cattle Co PtrRirie, ID 83443$226,512
32Stanley And Kent Searle PartnershShelley, ID 83274$226,501
33B & H FarmingRupert, ID 83350$224,962
34James T Gneiting Desert FarmsLewisville, ID 83431$224,761
35Aristocrat FarmsNewdale, ID 83436$223,585
36Kendell Farms General PartnershipPocatello, ID 83201$215,992
37Burusco FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$205,168
38Dean Snarr & Son LLCIdaho Falls, ID 83402$202,058
39Zweifel Farms IncIdaho Falls, ID 83404$201,000
40Peggy LarsenRexburg, ID 83440$196,558

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag