Production Flexibility Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 11,976

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $303,871,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
21Gold Emblem Farms PtrIdaho Falls, ID 83405$588,688
22Harris AgMalta, ID 83342$582,467
23Neal & Mildred SauerMonteview, ID 83435$579,186
24Schritter FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$567,382
25David & Magdalene SauerMonteview, ID 83435$567,290
26Ida Gold Farms LLCBurley, ID 83318$526,881
27Hansen Farms Joint VentureRupert, ID 83350$503,104
28Walker Land & Cattle LLCIdaho Falls, ID 83402$497,576
29G Hofmeister & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$491,366
30Ruff Times FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$484,057
31Kunau FarmsBurley, ID 83318$481,394
32V O Brothers LandPingree, ID 83262$468,599
33Foster Land & Cattle Co PtrRirie, ID 83443$453,259
34Waterstreet FarmsOakley, ID 83346$450,555
35Great Rift Lands PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$436,970
36Cleft Of The Rock FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$436,564
37Pratt & ElliottAberdeen, ID 83210$435,852
38I & D PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$429,973
39Ronald H Bair & SonsBlackfoot, ID 83221$428,787
40Michaelson BrothersAmerican Falls, ID 83211$425,262

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag