Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,537

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $780,758,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Lazy Dj PartnershipBurley, ID 83318$1,828,062
22Hamilton Triple C FarmsRirie, ID 83443$1,745,713
23R & M Joint VentureRirie, ID 83443$1,672,275
24Kendall Jones FarmsBurley, ID 83318$1,638,669
25Weston & WestonLogan, UT 84323$1,629,714
26G Hofmeister & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,621,395
27Mcnabb FarmsInkom, ID 83245$1,591,099
28Foster Land & Cattle Co PtrRirie, ID 83443$1,507,060
29Little Fish Creek Grazing AssociaCarey, ID 83320$1,505,487
30Max D Parkinson & Family IncAshton, ID 83420$1,486,211
31Bank Of Commerce **Blackfoot, ID 83221$1,484,425
32Juniper Ridge Ranch IncAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,447,854
33Schorzman Ranch IncMalta, ID 83342$1,376,741
34C L FarmsJackson, WY 83001$1,359,917
35Abe RogersAshton, ID 83420$1,357,645
36Gregory M WrightArbon, ID 83212$1,342,821
37Cleft Of The Rock FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,310,258
38W L Judy Farms PtOrem, UT 84058$1,303,687
39Sage Chicken RanchDeclo, ID 83323$1,282,520
40Flying A Ranch IncAshton, ID 83420$1,274,142

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag