Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22,944

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $2,131,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Cranney BrothersOakley, ID 83346$11,843,883
2Driscoll BrothersPocatello, ID 83201$11,154,717
3Wada Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$9,440,611
4Golden Ridge FarmsJackson, ID 83350$8,389,780
5Gehring Agri-businessAmerican Falls, ID 83211$7,413,463
6Polatis Brothers FarmsBlackfoot, ID 83221$6,239,374
7Thompson Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$6,000,460
8Jentzsch-kearl FarmsRupert, ID 83350$5,785,011
9Barker AgSoda Springs, ID 83276$5,178,833
10Ida Gold Farms LLCBurley, ID 83318$5,163,490
11Skyline FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$4,923,242
12Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$4,880,850
13Vo Enterprises PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$4,781,155
14Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$4,305,785
15Eagle View Farms LLCCastleford, ID 83321$4,266,670
16Big Sky DairyJerome, ID 83338$4,257,279
17Double C FarmsBurley, ID 83318$4,247,955
18Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$4,155,366
19Behrend Behrend & Knittel FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$4,142,927
20Bj Christensen & SonsBlackfoot, ID 83221$4,140,558

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag