Conservation Reserve Program in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 704
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost) totaled $18,857,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James A Metter | Columbia, IL 62236 | $75,921 |
62 | Leonard W Vogt | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $75,585 |
63 | William C Hawn | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $73,657 |
64 | Harold A Diehl Irrevocable Trust | Pocola, OK 74902 | $72,517 |
65 | Mark R Kern | Prairie Du Rocher, IL 62277 | $71,424 |
66 | Patricia M Wilson | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $70,789 |
67 | Ruth Campbell Evans Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $70,643 |
68 | Alberta M Rosenberg | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $69,424 |
69 | Marigold Farms Inc | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $68,149 |
70 | Russell L Row Jr | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $68,054 |
71 | Roy H Weihl | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $67,480 |
72 | Mark Hoffmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $66,531 |
73 | Ralph Buettner | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $66,357 |
74 | Myron A Rapp Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $66,354 |
75 | Steven Eschmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $66,284 |
76 | John Steingruby | Fults, IL 62244 | $65,651 |
77 | Anthony Kruse | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $64,512 |
78 | David L Storment | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $64,067 |
79 | Mark Landewee | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $63,996 |
80 | Glenn F Schultheis Living Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $63,914 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”