Conservation Reserve Program in 13th District of Illinois (Rep. Rodney Davis), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 968

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 13th District of Illinois (Rep. Rodney Davis) totaled $25,533,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21Paul M Isringhausen Sr RevocableJerseyville, IL 62052$250,059
22Randall C NealJerseyville, IL 62052$245,902
23Donald WalshBrighton, IL 62012$244,494
24Joseph E Crandall Revocable Living TrustChesterfield, MO 63017$222,013
25Schef-new Land TrustAlton, IL 62002$208,968
26Lanny JokersChesterfield, IL 62630$207,683
27Larry LoyJerseyville, IL 62052$202,364
28Timbercreek Valley Ranch PartnershipGrafton, IL 62037$199,964
29Scott IsringhausenJerseyville, IL 62052$189,543
30Ralph B SchuckenbrockFieldon, IL 62031$179,610
31Terry D Blasa Revocable Living TrJerseyville, IL 62052$175,710
32Delbert KanallakanJerseyville, IL 62052$173,086
33Frank J RothJerseyville, IL 62052$172,312
34Craig BrangenbergJerseyville, IL 62052$165,784
35Paul M Isringhausen Sr Rvoc TrJerseyville, IL 62052$152,861
36Bonnie M DouglasGrafton, IL 62037$151,941
37Alvina R Isringhausen Revocable TJerseyville, IL 62052$151,171
38Agreement Of Herbert Stanley Fraley Rvoc TrJerseyville, IL 62052$141,132
39Leland R CannadyJerseyville, IL 62052$138,736
40Alvina R Isringhausen Rvoc TrJerseyville, IL 62052$138,525

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag