Deficiency Payment in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 14,295
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $30,162,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Apelern Inc | Danville, IL 61834 | $16,608 |
202 | James T Mattingly III | Seminole, FL 33772 | $16,603 |
203 | Travis Bros | Belknap, IL 62908 | $16,596 |
204 | Stanley Joe Miller | Annapolis, IL 62413 | $16,537 |
205 | Checkley Bros Farm | Ashmore, IL 61912 | $16,514 |
206 | Charles Tennis | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $16,509 |
207 | Don & Jerry Davis Grain Farms Inc | Lawrenceville, IL 62439 | $16,492 |
208 | John D Shore | Casey, IL 62420 | $16,476 |
209 | Kuhl Bros & Sons | Newton, IL 62448 | $16,460 |
210 | Peter L Secondino | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $16,416 |
211 | John Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $16,386 |
212 | Wetzel Inc | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $16,379 |
213 | Donald R Rister | Omaha, IL 62871 | $16,372 |
214 | Daniel Hish | Ridgway, IL 62979 | $16,366 |
215 | Marilyn Fieber | Grayville, IL 62844 | $16,308 |
216 | Jerome J Waller | Brocton, IL 61917 | $16,296 |
217 | Mcclure Farms | Newton, IL 62448 | $16,279 |
218 | Jane N Mangrum | Paris, IL 61944 | $16,268 |
219 | Marguerite Schmidt | Belknap, IL 62908 | $16,207 |
220 | Henry Foss | Metropolis, IL 62960 | $16,180 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”