Farm Subsidy information
15th District of Illinois
(Rep. John Shimkus)
Total Subsidies in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 8,165
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $37,424,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jakob L Campbell | Carmi, IL 62821 | $46,922 |
82 | Fizzle Flat Farm LLC | Yale, IL 62481 | $46,865 |
83 | Johnson Farms | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $46,772 |
84 | Brian Warner | Oakland, IL 61943 | $46,613 |
85 | Will Bros | Montrose, IL 62445 | $45,988 |
86 | Steven P Keller | Newton, IL 62448 | $45,747 |
87 | Z Charles Jones | Greenup, IL 62428 | $45,722 |
88 | Joe Jansen | Mason, IL 62443 | $45,589 |
89 | Nina Sue Camp | Kansas, IL 61933 | $44,811 |
90 | Dale Bremer | Metropolis, IL 62960 | $44,310 |
91 | King Bend LLC | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $44,218 |
92 | Karch D Knollenberg | Oblong, IL 62449 | $44,065 |
93 | Mollie Claire Lawrence | Nashville, TN 37203 | $43,690 |
94 | Atwood Farms Inc | Cisne, IL 62823 | $43,577 |
95 | Gaylon Maurice Lawrence Jr | Nashville, TN 37203 | $43,428 |
96 | John J Gettinger | Merom, IN 47861 | $42,971 |
97 | William B Brazier | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $42,723 |
98 | Kristi Woodrow | Enfield, IL 62835 | $42,492 |
99 | Adam R Martin | Wilson, AR 72395 | $42,270 |
100 | Schiver Farms Inc | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $41,851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”