Conservation Reserve Program in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 7,282
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $23,166,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stanley Holsapple Revocable Trust | Toledo, IL 62468 | $28,062 |
82 | Reta Holsapple Revocable Trust | Toledo, IL 62468 | $28,062 |
83 | Ann M Pearcy | Charleston, IL 61920 | $27,974 |
84 | Stephen H Mattis | West Union, IL 62477 | $27,919 |
85 | Ray Haarmann | Effingham, IL 62401 | $27,899 |
86 | Cathy Brummer | Teutopolis, IL 62467 | $27,769 |
87 | Ann N Hout | Flora, IL 62839 | $27,645 |
88 | Earl Duane Reynolds | Watson, IL 62473 | $27,562 |
89 | Mason Christian Church | Mason, IL 62443 | $27,309 |
90 | Alice Moore | Norris City, IL 62869 | $27,269 |
91 | Ronald E Black | Toledo, IL 62468 | $27,122 |
92 | Mjjl LLC | Lawrenceville, IL 62439 | $26,682 |
93 | Eugene Stamme | Brookport, IL 62910 | $26,603 |
94 | H-b Farms | Effingham, IL 62401 | $26,592 |
95 | Robert Nelson | Mason, IL 62443 | $26,496 |
96 | John A Lafont | Brookport, IL 62910 | $26,454 |
97 | Reid Lee Thacker | Sumner, IL 62466 | $26,303 |
98 | Jerry Phillips | Effingham, IL 62401 | $26,211 |
99 | Ralph J Goldstein | Mason, IL 62443 | $26,164 |
100 | Connie Dick | New Port Richey, FL 34653 | $25,935 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”