Counter Cyclical Program in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 18,876
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $85,624,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Welsh Ag Enterprises | Marshall, IL 62441 | $60,500 |
122 | Kelly Cheesewright | Chrisman, IL 61924 | $60,445 |
123 | David L Howard | Dayton, OH 45417 | $60,201 |
124 | Rt Farms | West Salem, IL 62476 | $59,830 |
125 | Monte J Overton | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $59,690 |
126 | Steven C Oestreich | Xenia, IL 62899 | $59,684 |
127 | John A Lafont | Brookport, IL 62910 | $59,683 |
128 | Lathrop Farms Inc | Claremont, IL 62421 | $59,589 |
129 | Abm Farms Inc | Charleston, IL 61920 | $59,219 |
130 | Bradley H Luth | Hume, IL 61932 | $59,171 |
131 | Myles D Overton | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $59,162 |
132 | K & K Grain Farms Inc | Oblong, IL 62449 | $59,035 |
133 | Lori A Brengle | Metcalf, IL 61940 | $58,966 |
134 | Schrader Farms Inc | Bridgeport, IL 62417 | $58,769 |
135 | Edward Leo Baumgart Jr | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $58,662 |
136 | J Williams Farms Inc | West Union, IL 62477 | $58,661 |
137 | Ronald Everett Hawkins | Casey, IL 62420 | $58,095 |
138 | Terry Joe Hendrix | Dana, IN 47847 | $57,927 |
139 | Bill L Bailey | Xenia, IL 62899 | $57,555 |
140 | Norma Jean Bailey | Louisville, IL 62858 | $57,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”