Total Conservation Programs in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 19,330

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $508,084,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
121Bytha I Holsapple TrustGreenup, IL 62428$384,970
122Martin Ray BarbreCarmi, IL 62821$384,025
123Evelyn K Stanfield Living TrustAshmore, IL 61912$381,296
124Brenda J LittekenCharleston, IL 61920$373,292
125Tonn BrothersMason, IL 62443$372,578
126Raymond Parker Houser Jr Irrevocable TrustToledo, IL 62468$369,365
127John E Mckinley Revocable Trust-john E MckinleyEddyville, IL 62928$368,053
128Robert Wm FitchBrookport, IL 62910$366,377
129Alice MooreNorris City, IL 62869$365,805
130H-b FarmsEffingham, IL 62401$364,546
131Biggs FarmsWestfield, IL 62474$364,172
132Charles G Musgrave Living TrustHutsonville, IL 62433$364,113
133Larry SidwellEffingham, IL 62401$363,230
134Wendel GoodwinAltamont, IL 62411$362,408
135Clapp Farms LpAshmore, IL 61912$360,848
136Philip W SherwoodToledo, IL 62468$360,826
137Diel Farms IncNoble, IL 62868$359,954
138Charles D ShickLawrenceville, IL 62439$355,294
139Earl W LoudermilkWest Salem, IL 62476$353,698
140Nancy SecondinoParis, IL 61944$353,257

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag