Total Commodity Programs in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 44,540
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 15th District of Illinois (Rep. John Shimkus) totaled $2,403,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pat Scates & Sons | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $9,772,746 |
2 | Howard Bros Farms | Junction, IL 62954 | $6,626,986 |
3 | Moody Farms Partnership | Paris, IL 61944 | $5,746,326 |
4 | Campbell Farms | Carmi, IL 62821 | $5,623,806 |
5 | Johnson Farms | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $4,097,817 |
6 | Stevens Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $3,992,349 |
7 | Golden Brothers | Norris City, IL 62869 | $3,541,846 |
8 | Downen Enterprises | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $3,472,678 |
9 | Ivers Bros | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $3,445,165 |
10 | Lorenzen Farms Ptrp | Chrisman, IL 61924 | $3,336,612 |
11 | M F O | Waverly, KY 42462 | $2,911,096 |
12 | Baumgart Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $2,875,225 |
13 | Walk Stock Farm Inc | Neoga, IL 62447 | $2,836,152 |
14 | Pifer Farms | Palestine, IL 62451 | $2,788,085 |
15 | Welsh Ag Enterprises | Marshall, IL 62441 | $2,648,680 |
16 | Clover Farms | Olney, IL 62450 | $2,525,621 |
17 | David Mack Brown | Carmi, IL 62821 | $2,404,405 |
18 | Hish Farms Partnerhsip | Ridgway, IL 62979 | $2,382,011 |
19 | Gary L Eckel | Noble, IL 62868 | $2,334,512 |
20 | A S & K Farms | Enfield, IL 62835 | $2,328,411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>