Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $261,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Riddell Revocable Farm Trust | New Windsor, IL 61465 | $3,247 |
22 | H W Schwarz Jr | Elmhurst, IL 60126 | $3,206 |
23 | Raymond D Dowsett | Viola, IL 61486 | $3,186 |
24 | Kenneth Pierce | Stockton, IL 61085 | $3,000 |
25 | Brinkmeier Farms Inc | Warren, IL 61087 | $3,000 |
26 | Lester F Birkhead | Monmouth, IL 61462 | $2,950 |
27 | Gilbert Tranel | East Dubuque, IL 61025 | $2,933 |
28 | John V Pettit Jr | Port Byron, IL 61275 | $2,903 |
29 | Stanley Ashmore | Palmer, AK 99645 | $2,449 |
30 | James Walker | Coal Valley, IL 61240 | $2,351 |
31 | Duane Goderis | Aledo, IL 61231 | $2,309 |
32 | Robert R Burger | New Boston, IL 61272 | $2,253 |
33 | Russell E Thompson Jr | Port Byron, IL 61275 | $2,219 |
34 | Randy C Marston | Joy, IL 61260 | $2,183 |
35 | Roger Redington | Galena, IL 61036 | $1,877 |
36 | Terry L Charles | Mount Carroll, IL 61053 | $1,785 |
37 | Stanley A Boruff | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $1,728 |
38 | Mark Mccoy | Galena, IL 61036 | $1,400 |
39 | Lily G Clifford | New Boston, IL 61272 | $1,176 |
40 | Joy Wildlife Farms | Joy, IL 61260 | $971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”