Emergency Conservation Program in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 193
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $421,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Melvin H Short | New Boston, IL 61272 | $3,277 |
42 | David L Reason Revocable Living Trust | Joy, IL 61260 | $3,162 |
43 | Nick Helgerson | Zwingle, IA 52079 | $3,136 |
44 | Lloyd H Kenney Jr | New Boston, IL 61272 | $3,100 |
45 | Martin Cleary Trust | Apple River, IL 61001 | $3,072 |
46 | Muhlenburg Farms | Aledo, IL 61231 | $3,030 |
47 | Merle L Danner | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $2,958 |
48 | Lewis Riniker | Galena, IL 61036 | $2,877 |
49 | James H Curtis | Galena, IL 61036 | $2,861 |
50 | Susan A Davis | Le Claire, IA 52753 | $2,842 |
51 | Iris I Hawn | Keithsburg, IL 61442 | $2,780 |
52 | Gary Saam | Scales Mound, IL 61075 | $2,667 |
53 | Edward Lee Snyder | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $2,550 |
54 | Alan C Wills | Galena, IL 61036 | $2,511 |
55 | Roger Redington | Galena, IL 61036 | $2,498 |
56 | Jack M Thirtyacre | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $2,240 |
57 | Bret Mcgreer | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $2,117 |
58 | Robert R Burger | New Boston, IL 61272 | $2,104 |
59 | Virgil Irwin | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $2,059 |
60 | Donald K Rursch | Taylor Ridge, IL 61284 | $2,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”