Emergency Conservation Program in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 193
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $421,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sandra M Wolfram | Apple River, IL 61001 | $1,360 |
82 | Vernon Wubben | East Dubuque, IL 61025 | $1,349 |
83 | Chris Hohenboken | Newark, NY 14513 | $1,328 |
84 | Dwight L Shoemaker | Aledo, IL 61231 | $1,312 |
85 | Terry Schoenhard | Scales Mound, IL 61075 | $1,302 |
86 | Thomas D Noble Family Trust | New Boston, IL 61272 | $1,288 |
87 | Lloyd Jack Noble | New Boston, IL 61272 | $1,288 |
88 | Anita M Carter | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $1,265 |
89 | Rose Ann M. Kunkel Revocable Trust | Dubuque, IA 52001 | $1,260 |
90 | Donald F Renner | Garden Prairie, IL 61038 | $1,258 |
91 | Howard H Tranel | East Dubuque, IL 61025 | $1,256 |
92 | Randy R Murdock | Reynolds, IL 61279 | $1,248 |
93 | T C Montgomery Farm Trust | Iowa City, IA 52244 | $1,229 |
94 | Herman Goken | Galena, IL 61036 | $1,192 |
95 | Ralph Tranel | East Dubuque, IL 61025 | $1,187 |
96 | Mcfadden Farms Inc | Apple River, IL 61001 | $1,187 |
97 | Danny Bull | Taylor Ridge, IL 61284 | $1,152 |
98 | David F Duncan | Aledo, IL 61231 | $1,145 |
99 | Rogers Brothers | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,145 |
100 | Smith Farm Agency | Muscatine, IA 52761 | $1,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”