Total Conservation Programs in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,160

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $6,972,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2022
101Frances L Borhart Revocable TrustIllinois City, IL 61259$17,569
102Vulture Valley North LLCPalos Park, IL 60464$17,550
103Philip S KoreskoAledo, IL 61231$17,415
104Bradley L And Melinda J Wagner Revocable Living TrSaint Charles, MO 63304$17,263
105River Valley Turf PartnershipGeneseo, IL 61254$16,916
106Travis R WestergreenLexington, IL 61753$16,906
107Teri J ConnollyMilan, IL 61264$16,898
108Wayne MatterViola, IL 61486$16,714
109Donald J HoutakkerBelleville, MI 48111$16,700
110Virginia J WhitenackViola, IL 61486$16,679
111Dean S OlsonAledo, IL 61231$16,566
112Marilynn E WillitsNew Boston, IL 61272$16,535
113Robert E Declerck TrustReynolds, IL 61279$16,379
114Shaw Family Farm LLCDavenport, IA 52803$16,337
115Ruthndel Bar-j Farm Inc.Bradenton, FL 34209$16,286
116Roger-roger Leonard Kenney 2018 Revocabl L KenneyAledo, IL 61231$15,984
117Steinman Kehoe Farm PartnershipMoline, IL 61265$15,942
118Thomas A WatsonIllinois City, IL 61259$15,723
119Eugene E DewitteMapleton, IL 61547$15,672
120Thomas E CadySherrard, IL 61281$15,506

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag