Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,211
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $3,872,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mike Frieden | Joy, IL 61260 | $24,335 |
22 | Keith Kindelsperger | Lynn Center, IL 61262 | $23,379 |
23 | James A Zwicker | Orion, IL 61273 | $22,988 |
24 | John Solomonson | Orion, IL 61273 | $22,828 |
25 | Christopher M Whan | Sherrard, IL 61281 | $22,533 |
26 | Rex M Frieden | New Boston, IL 61272 | $22,315 |
27 | Kirk Wainwright | Hillsdale, IL 61257 | $22,263 |
28 | Douglas A Mills | Illinois City, IL 61259 | $20,828 |
29 | Saline Farm Inc | Rio, IL 61472 | $20,531 |
30 | William E Crawford Revocable Living Trust | Joy, IL 61260 | $20,366 |
31 | Close Farms | Reynolds, IL 61279 | $20,199 |
32 | Joshua R Baker | Aledo, IL 61231 | $19,885 |
33 | Dena L Hawn | Keithsburg, IL 61442 | $19,544 |
34 | Nathan Frieden | New Boston, IL 61272 | $19,161 |
35 | Mark R Olin | Alexis, IL 61412 | $18,428 |
36 | David Olson | Seaton, IL 61476 | $18,129 |
37 | Rogers Brothers | Stockton, IL 61085 | $18,019 |
38 | William E Crawford | New Boston, IL 61272 | $17,654 |
39 | Rodney Stinson | Port Byron, IL 61275 | $17,627 |
40 | John E Retherford | Joy, IL 61260 | $17,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”