Total Emergency Relief Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 164
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $3,029,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $15,743 | |
42 | Logan Eidson | Clayton, IL 62324 | $15,659 |
43 | Richard Jokisch | Bluff Springs, IL 62622 | $14,339 |
44 | David Greenwood | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $13,791 |
45 | Troy H Brierton | Versailles, IL 62378 | $13,421 |
46 | Kent A Boylen | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $13,304 |
47 | Kevin Duckwiler | Chandlerville, IL 62627 | $13,288 |
48 | Chad Michael Markert | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $13,103 |
49 | Kevin Burrus | Meredosia, IL 62665 | $12,721 |
50 | J Michael Johnson Rev Living Trust | Effingham, IL 62401 | $12,713 |
51 | Wankel Farms Partnership | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $12,647 |
52 | Gary G Gerdes | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $12,101 |
53 | Kyle J Smith | Clayton, IL 62324 | $11,903 |
54 | , | $11,732 | |
55 | Richard Hapke | Clayton, IL 62324 | $11,667 |
56 | David Glasgow | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $11,172 |
57 | Aaron R Kassing | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $11,083 |
58 | Robert Alexander | Arenzville, IL 62611 | $9,669 |
59 | Lucille Alexander Tr | Arenzville, IL 62611 | $9,669 |
60 | Donald Lehne | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $9,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”