Market Gains in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 243
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $3,623,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Wm Dean Paydon | Plainfield, IL 60544 | $18,862 |
62 | Robert H Virgin | Virginia, IL 62691 | $17,756 |
63 | Bob W Tice | Ashland, IL 62612 | $15,811 |
64 | Dale Whitehurst | Tallula, IL 62688 | $15,420 |
65 | Savage Farms Ltd | Ashland, IL 62612 | $14,950 |
66 | Edward Engel | Athens, IL 62613 | $14,859 |
67 | Heritage Investment Trust 1155 | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $14,838 |
68 | Indian Point Farms Inc | Greenview, IL 62642 | $13,909 |
69 | Jeremy Dotzert | Virginia, IL 62691 | $13,405 |
70 | Gary G Gerdes | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $13,289 |
71 | C William Mayfield | Cantrall, IL 62625 | $13,153 |
72 | Thomas M Schaddel | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $12,714 |
73 | Frank Simmering | Greenview, IL 62642 | $12,382 |
74 | Robert Sampson | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $12,123 |
75 | East Petersburg Development Co | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $11,991 |
76 | Don Piper | Beardstown, IL 62618 | $11,939 |
77 | Virginia Farm Services Inc | Virginia, IL 62691 | $11,691 |
78 | Hendricker-davis Farms | Montgomery, TX 77316 | $11,621 |
79 | Donald Dean Wilkerson | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $11,579 |
80 | Dale Vanetten | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $11,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”