Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 250

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $999,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
161Harold R ClarkArlington Heights, IL 60005$1,328
162Marian V WagnerMount Sterling, IL 62353$1,324
163Jensen Woods Church CampTimewell, IL 62375$1,322
164John G SelfVersailles, IL 62378$1,319
165Richard HapkeClayton, IL 62324$1,277
166Marcia A. Taylor Declaration Of TrustMount Sterling, IL 62353$1,259
167Gerald CrankMount Sterling, IL 62353$1,249
168Leslie A DavenportClayton, IL 62324$1,234
169Lawrence D Veith EstMount Sterling, IL 62353$1,228
170James L Gladwell IIIWilliston, FL 32696$1,219
171Dennis AldermanSpringfield, IL 62707$1,214
172Leverda Mumme-marvel Revocable TrustMount Sterling, IL 62353$1,204
173James Blake Non-exempt TrustOklahoma City, OK 73124$1,194
174Kevin Blake Gst Exempt TrustOklahoma City, OK 73124$1,192
175Kevin Blake Non-exempt TrustOklahoma City, OK 73124$1,192
176James Blake Gst Exempt TrustOklahoma City, OK 73124$1,192
177Richard R WebelVersailles, IL 62378$1,169
178Anna BauchTimewell, IL 62375$1,155
179Charles Robert HamiltonVersailles, IL 62378$1,149
180Fern E ThoromanVersailles, IL 62378$1,133

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag