Conservation Reserve Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,183

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $123,590,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21James K RolfArenzville, IL 62611$518,869
22Nancy BrooksOakford, IL 62673$513,864
23Irish Groves Farms PartnershipGreenview, IL 62642$499,293
24Clarence J Beide TrustMeredosia, IL 62665$492,578
25Steven K RolfBeardstown, IL 62618$485,701
26Effie G SnyderRushville, IL 62681$483,112
27Nbj IncOakford, IL 62673$476,078
28J Stribling Farms IncAshland, IL 62612$459,198
29Ronald SchenkMount Sterling, IL 62353$454,716
30John B LeonardMount Sterling, IL 62353$450,424
31Cheslea C Taylor IIVirginia, IL 62691$436,605
32William H SowleSpringfield, IL 62704$434,596
33Karen Divjak Johnson Rev Liv TrustSpringfield, IL 62708$429,186
34S & O Markert TrustMount Sterling, IL 62353$423,722
35Virginia L Dewitt -c/o Michael DewittTimewell, IL 62375$420,144
36River Bottom Limited PartnershipBeardstown, IL 62618$418,910
37John F ReganDecatur, IL 62523$416,039
38Steven C Kasten TrustPetersburg, IL 62675$415,453
39Sdm Carls IncBeardstown, IL 62618$401,088
40George A ClarkMount Sterling, IL 62353$386,524

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag