Conservation Reserve Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,394

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $138,143,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Dale HobrockBeardstown, IL 62618$429,444
42Virginia L Dewitt -c/o Michael DewittTimewell, IL 62375$420,144
43John F ReganDecatur, IL 62523$416,039
44St Peters Lutheran ChArenzville, IL 62611$410,121
45Robert SampsonPetersburg, IL 62675$408,112
46Dennis Ray HoustonMount Sterling, IL 62353$389,665
47Dale SchonewisSpringfield, IL 62704$388,314
48Tony Lee AntonacciChandlerville, IL 62627$387,237
49Luther WeltyMount Sterling, IL 62353$385,674
50H Dwain SmithMount Sterling, IL 62353$385,596
51Paul CroweBeardstown, IL 62618$376,406
52Richard HinrichsAshland, IL 62612$371,234
53Richard F AlsupVersailles, IL 62378$371,158
54Cecelia AntonacciChandlerville, IL 62627$363,000
55Jack RobertsonSpringfield, IL 62711$359,718
56Ronald E Sweatman 2011 Declaration Of TrustBloomington, IL 61701$357,440
57Twin Hollows IncQuincy, IL 62301$357,241
58Lounsberry FarmsOakford, IL 62673$353,132
59Vernon Hapke Jr Revocable TrustClayton, IL 62324$345,965
60Schirding Fms IncPetersburg, IL 62675$345,714

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag