Market Loss Assistance Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,783
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $27,585,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roberts Farms | Timewell, IL 62375 | $107,220 |
22 | Russell C Hinrichs | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $105,590 |
23 | Terry Hinrichs | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $105,590 |
24 | J D S Holliday | Greenview, IL 62642 | $102,791 |
25 | Brooks Farms Inc | Oakford, IL 62673 | $101,523 |
26 | Louis Albert Hammer | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $101,398 |
27 | Wayne Winkelmann | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $101,347 |
28 | Artsons Inc | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $100,698 |
29 | Holliday Farms | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $98,849 |
30 | Fertile Valley Farm | Beardstown, IL 62618 | $97,322 |
31 | Herbert C Snow | Virginia, IL 62691 | $94,067 |
32 | Karl Beaty | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $89,990 |
33 | Timothy Newton | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $89,869 |
34 | James K Deppe | Virginia, IL 62691 | $89,494 |
35 | Lounsberry Farms | Oakford, IL 62673 | $86,080 |
36 | Shields Farms Inc | Timewell, IL 62375 | $85,874 |
37 | Sandra E Watkins | Virginia, IL 62691 | $84,665 |
38 | Alan Koch & Glen Koch Farms | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $84,368 |
39 | Allen Thomas | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $83,797 |
40 | Roger Sweatman | Virginia, IL 62691 | $82,529 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”