Total Conservation Programs in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,535

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $139,396,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1N Korsmeyer IncBeardstown, IL 62618$1,061,987
2Donald D NewtonMount Sterling, IL 62353$929,263
3Michael ThomasSpringfield, IL 62711$873,750
4Logsdon Sand & GravelBeardstown, IL 62618$840,037
5Reginald A Carls Trust No 11-06Jacksonville, IL 62650$834,957
6Charles R SnyderMount Sterling, IL 62353$790,164
7Paul D MasonMount Pulaski, IL 62548$759,415
8Walter Doug BenefieldNewnan, GA 30263$724,395
9L E ThornleyVirginia, IL 62691$714,784
10John D GrosbollPetersburg, IL 62675$713,563
11Kevin ThomasOakford, IL 62673$710,080
12Hilst Evans Land TrustHavana, IL 62644$695,152
13Honey Point Duck Club IncSpringfield, IL 62712$642,669
14Gary Kent Wilkerson EstateVersailles, IL 62378$631,706
15Charles Earnest Buxton JrMount Sterling, IL 62353$626,134
16John H Dormire & Son PartnershipMount Sterling, IL 62353$613,305
17Mark HessBeardstown, IL 62618$585,155
18James K RolfArenzville, IL 62611$578,142
19Jerry BrooksOakford, IL 62673$562,106
20Irish Groves Farms PartnershipGreenview, IL 62642$559,985

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag