Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 90
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $345,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Beverly Samons | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $317 |
62 | Elizabeth Marie Lauber-2 LLC | South Bend, IN 46628 | $311 |
63 | Kyle Mason | Bremen, IN 46506 | $288 |
64 | Kenneth Lamar Bachtel | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $284 |
65 | Regina Jones | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $254 |
66 | Cassandra Kay Leeper | Argos, IN 46501 | $238 |
67 | Martha Mary Lauber LLC | Northfield, IL 60093 | $217 |
68 | Christine A Lauber | South Bend, IN 46617 | $217 |
69 | Linda Verhaeghe | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $187 |
70 | Jeffrey Parry | Bremen, IN 46506 | $181 |
71 | Louise Glingle | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $179 |
72 | Joyce A Roberts | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $157 |
73 | , | $138 | |
74 | Joyce West | Argos, IN 46501 | $136 |
75 | Linda Moser | Bremen, IN 46506 | $127 |
76 | Jackson Jones | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $123 |
77 | Rebecca L Rouch | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $119 |
78 | Janet E Tapp Roat | Wichita, KS 67277 | $110 |
79 | Linda Klein | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $101 |
80 | Zachary L Boyer | Tippecanoe, IN 46570 | $96 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”