Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,065
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $58,574,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert Broeker | Culver, IN 46511 | $204,042 |
62 | Bruce Laidig | Bremen, IN 46506 | $203,592 |
63 | Mike Long Family Farms | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $202,796 |
64 | Billy Joe Davis | Argos, IN 46501 | $196,315 |
65 | Eddie Nelson Abbott | Bremen, IN 46506 | $195,024 |
66 | Berger Farms Inc | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $194,748 |
67 | Ort's Greene Meadows Inc | South Bend, IN 46614 | $193,580 |
68 | The Red Hen Turf Farm Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $192,288 |
69 | William Lappin | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $188,972 |
70 | James Eller | Osceola, IN 46561 | $187,696 |
71 | L Dean Zechiel | Argos, IN 46501 | $187,695 |
72 | John M Dooms | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $187,131 |
73 | Thomas L Doepker | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $186,685 |
74 | James E Truyaert | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $185,886 |
75 | Chad Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $183,460 |
76 | Tom Watkins | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $183,008 |
77 | Kenneth Sebasty Jr | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $181,896 |
78 | Kenneth Sebasty Sr | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $181,841 |
79 | Joseph Anthony Jasinski | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $180,790 |
80 | Devon A Smith | Bremen, IN 46506 | $180,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”