Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,741
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $40,687,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Neff Farms LLC | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $96,226 |
122 | Bill Heyde | Bremen, IN 46506 | $95,192 |
123 | Mark Mcintire | Argos, IN 46501 | $93,770 |
124 | Timothy Sean Mccarthy | Culver, IN 46511 | $93,750 |
125 | Daniel O Voreis | Argos, IN 46501 | $92,734 |
126 | Charles Ross | South Bend, IN 46614 | $91,158 |
127 | Jeffrey T Verhaeghe | Argos, IN 46501 | $90,950 |
128 | Clauss Farms Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $90,925 |
129 | August J Vanwanzeele | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $90,798 |
130 | Chad Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $90,744 |
131 | Nor Bert Farms LLC | Bremen, IN 46506 | $90,490 |
132 | Oscar E Serry | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $90,437 |
133 | Ronald Matthys | South Bend, IN 46619 | $89,708 |
134 | Larry Miller | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $89,041 |
135 | John E Doktor Jr | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $88,510 |
136 | Roger -roger Lee Dan Dankert | Bremen, IN 46506 | $86,655 |
137 | Weissert Brothers Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $86,240 |
138 | Don D Thompson Trust | Argos, IN 46501 | $84,898 |
139 | Donn Horein | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $84,551 |
140 | Ronald E Miller | Culver, IN 46511 | $81,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”