Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,811
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $19,412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | James Klockow | South Bend, IN 46614 | $42,075 |
122 | Joseph Anthony Jasinski | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $41,905 |
123 | Mark Mcintire | Argos, IN 46501 | $41,805 |
124 | David L Albert | Lapaz, IN 46537 | $41,751 |
125 | Randall Hawley | Bremen, IN 46506 | $41,505 |
126 | Fred Jones | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $41,444 |
127 | Good Bros | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $41,146 |
128 | Richard Schmidt | Bremen, IN 46506 | $41,038 |
129 | Oscar E Serry | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $40,872 |
130 | Steven J Holifield | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $40,749 |
131 | Gary Tillman | Bremen, IN 46506 | $40,670 |
132 | Joe Miller Wilson | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $40,316 |
133 | Donald E Meister | Bremen, IN 46506 | $40,265 |
134 | August J Vanwanzeele | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $40,139 |
135 | Dwight C Annis | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $40,049 |
136 | L Dean Zechiel | Argos, IN 46501 | $39,872 |
137 | Eller Farms Inc | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $39,693 |
138 | Michael E Williamson | Etna Green, IN 46524 | $39,674 |
139 | Michael Balsley Farms Inc | Bremen, IN 46506 | $39,529 |
140 | Dennis Worm | Bremen, IN 46506 | $39,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”