Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 611
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $4,991,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Berger Farms Inc | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $40,666 |
22 | Ronald Hayn | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $38,590 |
23 | Dale Hayn | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $38,590 |
24 | Steve Young | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $37,012 |
25 | Tina Ann Zechiel | Argos, IN 46501 | $36,333 |
26 | L Dean Zechiel | Argos, IN 46501 | $36,333 |
27 | Kenneth Weaver | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $35,243 |
28 | Samantha S Weaver | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $35,243 |
29 | Laidig Farms Partnership | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $35,212 |
30 | Ronald E Miller | Culver, IN 46511 | $34,409 |
31 | Frieconn Farms Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $34,291 |
32 | Declark Farms LLC | Mishawaka, IN 46544 | $34,069 |
33 | Legacy Dairy | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $33,244 |
34 | Carl F Prochno | Argos, IN 46501 | $31,933 |
35 | Bates Farms Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $30,493 |
36 | Dan Boyer Etal Triple B Farms | Tippecanoe, IN 46570 | $30,456 |
37 | Gregory J Haas | Lakeville, IN 46536 | $29,988 |
38 | Thomas Farm Partnership | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $29,244 |
39 | Brenda S Prochno | Argos, IN 46501 | $29,202 |
40 | J R Stoller Farms LLC | Bremen, IN 46506 | $28,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”