Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,440
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $11,186,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Leininger Farms | Mishawaka, IN 46545 | $172,596 |
2 | Shady Lane Farms | South Bend, IN 46619 | $135,468 |
3 | J&t Laidig Farms Partnership | Bremen, IN 46506 | $129,130 |
4 | Martin Blad Farms Inc | South Bend, IN 46619 | $117,768 |
5 | Michael G Wagner | South Bend, IN 46614 | $97,445 |
6 | Lichtenbarger Farms | South Bend, IN 46628 | $96,435 |
7 | William L Voreis | Argos, IN 46501 | $95,154 |
8 | Marvin L Houin | Bremen, IN 46506 | $87,480 |
9 | Douglas Deschepper Farms Inc | Bremen, IN 46506 | $85,678 |
10 | Thomas L Doepker | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $85,465 |
11 | Davenport Farms Inc | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $79,963 |
12 | Dunnuck Grain Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $67,835 |
13 | Charles Ross | South Bend, IN 46614 | $66,787 |
14 | David L Schrock | Bremen, IN 46506 | $65,248 |
15 | Diana Lynn Schrock | Bremen, IN 46506 | $65,247 |
16 | Mike Long Family Farms | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $65,000 |
17 | William L Voreis Jr | Argos, IN 46501 | $63,437 |
18 | Homer Seltenright | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $63,388 |
19 | Whitmer Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $60,473 |
20 | Merl Hayn | Argos, IN 46501 | $60,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>