Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,811
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Indiana (Rep. Jackie Walorski) totaled $19,412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carl Roger Schweisberger | Bremen, IN 46506 | $101,307 |
22 | Homer Seltenright | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $100,194 |
23 | Randall Matthys | South Bend, IN 46619 | $99,888 |
24 | Jeffrey T Verhaeghe | Argos, IN 46501 | $99,660 |
25 | Marcell P Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $99,640 |
26 | Thomas L Doepker | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $94,347 |
27 | Frieconn Farms Inc | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $94,125 |
28 | Ronald Hayn | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $91,912 |
29 | Dale Hayn | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $91,912 |
30 | Ivan Truyaert | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $89,325 |
31 | John M Dooms | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $87,645 |
32 | James E Mccune | Argos, IN 46501 | $86,288 |
33 | Davenport Farms Inc | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $86,239 |
34 | Daniel O Voreis | Argos, IN 46501 | $84,418 |
35 | Circle R Ptnr | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $83,314 |
36 | Judith Kay Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $83,149 |
37 | Mike Long Family Farms | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $79,806 |
38 | William L Voreis Jr | Argos, IN 46501 | $79,076 |
39 | Maria J Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $78,489 |
40 | Thomas H Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $78,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”