Market Loss Assistance Program in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,623
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $22,300,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J Bruce Moody | Fremont, IN 46737 | $139,888 |
2 | Favourite Farms Inc | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $137,963 |
3 | Timothy A Favourite | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $131,670 |
4 | Rory & Diana Walker | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $125,874 |
5 | Coomer Bros | New Haven, IN 46774 | $122,144 |
6 | Seiler Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $122,032 |
7 | Brian Salomon | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $120,933 |
8 | Lomont Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $119,232 |
9 | Rex E Coomer | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $118,568 |
10 | Marvin & Phyllis Walker | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $117,720 |
11 | Harold E Dilts | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $116,428 |
12 | Knotek Farms Inc | Fremont, IN 46737 | $112,877 |
13 | Gaylord Parr | Orland, IN 46776 | $112,523 |
14 | Bacon Bros Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $111,764 |
15 | Rosene Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $111,020 |
16 | J Malfait Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $108,101 |
17 | Danny L Bremer | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $107,866 |
18 | John D Smith & Sons Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $105,849 |
19 | Michael Lomont | New Haven, IN 46774 | $104,317 |
20 | Bowers Bros Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $100,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>