Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Indiana
(Rep. Jim Banks)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,083
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $3,860,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Timothy Rorick | New Haven, IN 46774 | $16,201 |
42 | Paul Sloffer | Huntertown, IN 46748 | $15,893 |
43 | , | $14,531 | |
44 | Favourite Farms Inc | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $14,127 |
45 | Maloney Homestead LLC | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $13,290 |
46 | Chris M Funk | Fremont, IN 46737 | $13,244 |
47 | Brechbill Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $12,922 |
48 | John D Smith & Sons Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $12,239 |
49 | Bruick Brothers Produce Inc | New Haven, IN 46774 | $12,046 |
50 | Ridenour Farms Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $11,875 |
51 | James Gregory Mcneal | Corunna, IN 46730 | $11,227 |
52 | Geller Holdings LLC | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $11,040 |
53 | Gladlands, LLC | New Haven, IN 46774 | $10,942 |
54 | Andrew J Hruby | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $10,914 |
55 | Widney-carpenter Family Farms LLC | Butler, IN 46721 | $10,896 |
56 | Timothy Richardson | Huntertown, IN 46748 | $10,767 |
57 | Bennett A Noel | Fort Wayne, IN 46819 | $10,562 |
58 | William Van Wye | Ashley, IN 46705 | $10,475 |
59 | Crowe Forest Management LLC | Leo, IN 46765 | $10,395 |
60 | Kneubuhler Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $9,724 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”