Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,210
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $10,965,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | R & D Malcolm Farms Inc | Butler, IN 46721 | $40,353 |
42 | Rosene Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $39,745 |
43 | Steinman Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $39,571 |
44 | Haynes Dairy Farm Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $39,293 |
45 | Richard Rodenbeck | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $39,086 |
46 | J Malfait Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $37,894 |
47 | Ralph A Kurtz | New Haven, IN 46774 | $34,625 |
48 | Gary L Hilger | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $34,399 |
49 | Kevin Willibey | Angola, IN 46703 | $33,928 |
50 | Kim Willibey | Angola, IN 46703 | $33,927 |
51 | James Robert Cather | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $33,455 |
52 | Rosene Agri-transport Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $33,231 |
53 | Lake Farms LLC | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $33,002 |
54 | William Gene Clifford | Auburn, IN 46706 | $31,328 |
55 | John R Corbat | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $31,245 |
56 | Brymar Inc | Corunna, IN 46730 | $31,177 |
57 | Jim Kline | New Haven, IN 46774 | $30,744 |
58 | James W Brand | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $30,443 |
59 | George Brand | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $30,431 |
60 | O'shaughnessey Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $30,373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”