Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,879

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $40,537,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
1995-2023
41Timothy A FavouritePleasant Lake, IN 46779$152,915
42Custer Farms IncGarrett, IN 46738$149,383
43Willibey Bros PartnershipAngola, IN 46703$148,743
44Charles W HowardHamilton, IN 46742$146,646
45James Robert CatherHamilton, IN 46742$144,292
46Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline FarmsSpencerville, IN 46788$142,377
47Kees Grain FarmsHarlan, IN 46743$140,363
48O'shaughnessey Farms IncMonroeville, IN 46773$139,924
49Paul Crawford LLCFremont, IN 46737$139,638
50Max A MillerWaterloo, IN 46793$138,458
51Ray MendenhallNew Haven, IN 46774$134,665
52Wyss Farms Enterprises GpFort Wayne, IN 46819$134,527
53Mark R Rekeweg Farms LLCWoodburn, IN 46797$133,234
54Gail M SchlatterWoodburn, IN 46797$131,365
55Ralph A KurtzNew Haven, IN 46774$127,647
56Terry DaileyAngola, IN 46703$127,636
57Strong Farms LLCSaint Joe, IN 46785$125,991
58Robert P HulveyYoder, IN 46798$123,691
59Kummer Farms LLCAuburn, IN 46706$123,343
60Calvin Yoder Dba C Yoder & Sons FarmsSaint Joe, IN 46785$122,883

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag