Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Indiana
(Rep. Jim Banks)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 9,809
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $447,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lake Farms LLC | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $891,129 |
62 | Moughler Brothers Inc | Butler, IN 46721 | $884,951 |
63 | Garry Thrush | Garrett, IN 46738 | $879,029 |
64 | Kees Grain Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $874,695 |
65 | Martz Farms Inc | Corunna, IN 46730 | $873,874 |
66 | Joseph E Malcolm | Huntertown, IN 46748 | $858,502 |
67 | Jim Kline | New Haven, IN 46774 | $845,738 |
68 | Grate & Sons Dairy Farm Inc | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $841,960 |
69 | Jerry L Rinehart | Hudson, IN 46747 | $833,489 |
70 | Rob E T LLC | New Haven, IN 46774 | $826,085 |
71 | Stephen P Bachelor | Angola, IN 46703 | $817,652 |
72 | Blessing Farms | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $805,166 |
73 | Kummer Farms LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $803,980 |
74 | Omo Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $801,879 |
75 | Ray Mendenhall | New Haven, IN 46774 | $800,573 |
76 | Daniel L Fry | Butler, IN 46721 | $798,178 |
77 | Salomon Farms LLC | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $790,000 |
78 | Yerks Seed Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $783,512 |
79 | Lomont Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $779,477 |
80 | Max A Miller | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $779,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”