Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Indiana
(Rep. Jim Banks)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,809
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $447,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Willibey Bros Partnership | Angola, IN 46703 | $770,419 |
82 | Ray Melcher | New Haven, IN 46774 | $769,335 |
83 | Gaylord Parr | Orland, IN 46776 | $766,456 |
84 | David L Walters | Auburn, IN 46706 | $762,130 |
85 | Henry Hilger And Sons | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $755,946 |
86 | Keith Kuehnert | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $751,455 |
87 | Noah J Schwartz Lp | Grabill, IN 46741 | $750,000 |
88 | Brymar Inc | Corunna, IN 46730 | $740,856 |
89 | Paul D Wilson | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $735,679 |
90 | Ned S Byer | New Haven, IN 46774 | $735,081 |
91 | Roger Wm Hadley II | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $735,011 |
92 | Lakeside Farms Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $734,620 |
93 | L S Farms Llp | Howe, IN 46746 | $734,470 |
94 | William Gene Clifford | Auburn, IN 46706 | $729,811 |
95 | Gregory A Lomont | New Haven, IN 46774 | $729,669 |
96 | Marvin Douglas Presley | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $727,668 |
97 | Dewayne Doctor | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $727,381 |
98 | Thomas A Stoy | Ashley, IN 46705 | $726,048 |
99 | John R Corbat | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $722,941 |
100 | Rick E Taylor | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $718,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”