Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 152
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $2,700,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Daniel J Troyer | Lagrange, IN 46761 | $5,496 |
82 | J&d Family Farms LLC | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $5,314 |
83 | R & E Corbat LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $5,126 |
84 | Wolheter Farms LLC | Kendallville, IN 46755 | $4,504 |
85 | Gregory Hook | Butler, IN 46721 | $4,411 |
86 | Terry Hardy | Huntington, IN 46750 | $3,831 |
87 | Kenneth Kurtz | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $3,612 |
88 | Margaret R Wilson | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $3,430 |
89 | Richard M Hite | Fremont, IN 46737 | $3,136 |
90 | Steve Hilger | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $3,125 |
91 | Jacob Ryan Walker | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $2,938 |
92 | James Jackemeyer | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $2,921 |
93 | Robert O Vonderau | New Haven, IN 46774 | $2,879 |
94 | Patsy E Hardy | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $2,861 |
95 | David Middleton | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $2,847 |
96 | Cedar Creek Farms Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $2,634 |
97 | Daniel J Spieth | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $2,565 |
98 | David Krohn | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $2,563 |
99 | Wyss Farms Enterprises | Fort Wayne, IN 46819 | $2,235 |
100 | Thomas G Stump | Avilla, IN 46710 | $2,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”