Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Indiana
(Rep. Jim Banks)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,409
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $12,715,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Favourite Farms Inc | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $22,833 |
122 | Darwin Harmeyer | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $22,721 |
123 | Keith Kuehnert | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $22,515 |
124 | David L Gerardot | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $22,380 |
125 | Randy Provines | Butler, IN 46721 | $22,298 |
126 | Joshua R Delancey | Angola, IN 46703 | $22,192 |
127 | Tim Griffin | Garrett, IN 46738 | $22,136 |
128 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $22,103 |
129 | Lois A Maile | Daniel Island, SC 29492 | $21,927 |
130 | Geller Holdings LLC | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $21,725 |
131 | Howard Faulstick | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $21,716 |
132 | Aldrich Farms Inc | Corunna, IN 46730 | $21,713 |
133 | William E Taylor | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $21,531 |
134 | Phe LLC | Garrett, IN 46738 | $21,431 |
135 | Mark Dennis | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $21,191 |
136 | Darin Yarian | Hudson, IN 46747 | $21,001 |
137 | Arnett Family Farms Incorporated | Butler, IN 46721 | $20,942 |
138 | William J Buchs | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $20,780 |
139 | James A Geller Jr | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $20,744 |
140 | Ronald Smith | New Haven, IN 46774 | $20,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”