Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 983
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $1,692,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bryan R Wipperman | South Bend, IN 46628 | $6,763 |
42 | Elmer L Lengacher | Harlan, IN 46743 | $6,717 |
43 | Diane S Smith | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $6,640 |
44 | Stan Kruse | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $6,609 |
45 | Kathy M Enterline | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $6,444 |
46 | S Edward Steury | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $6,318 |
47 | Bachelor Farms LLC | Angola, IN 46703 | $6,230 |
48 | David Wiant & Ronald Dicke Trust | Garrett, IN 46738 | $6,148 |
49 | John-rev Trust Of John C Bachelor Bachelor | Toledo, OH 43606 | $6,112 |
50 | Douglas L Coolman | Angola, IN 46703 | $6,109 |
51 | David Dettmer | Auburn, IN 46706 | $5,974 |
52 | Dorothy S Erieau | Auburn, IN 46706 | $5,845 |
53 | R Malcolm Family LLC | Butler, IN 46721 | $5,784 |
54 | John Brooks | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $5,780 |
55 | Custer Farms Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $5,754 |
56 | Ronald Lanning | Butler, IN 46721 | $5,684 |
57 | Bob Bruns | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $5,650 |
58 | Walker Farms Gp | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $5,565 |
59 | Peter A Hippensteel Rev Trust | Angola, IN 46703 | $5,530 |
60 | Janel A Rogers | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”